Jump to content

Talk:List of military special forces units

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Better way to reorganize this list visually?

[edit]

For those who help maintain this article frequently (as well as any other viewers who may see this), I was thinking we could probably improve the readability of the article by converting the list entries into a standardized table format. Here's an example I'd suggest:

Special Forces Units
Nation Service Branch Parent Command Unit Notes
Lebanon Lebanese Army Ground Forces Lebanese Armed Forces Special Operations Command Lebanese Commando Regiment (aka "Ranger Regiment")[1][2]
Mexico Mexican Army Special Forces Corps[3] Special Reaction Force
Mexican Navy[4] Amphibious Special Forces Group
refs

References

  1. ^ "Reports: Maroun al-Qobayati Replaces Roukoz as Commando Regiment Chief". naharnet.com. 8 October 2015. Archived from the original on 13 February 2018. Retrieved 2 August 2021.
  2. ^ "The United States Army SWCS". www.soc.mil. June 2012. Archived from the original on 15 April 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  3. ^ "Fuerzas Especiales, 'a la baja' en gobierno de Peña Nieto". unioncancun.mx. 6 May 2014. Archived from the original on 7 November 2017. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  4. ^ "Los G.I. Joe mexicanos: La elite de la Marina". vanguardia.com.mx. 22 September 2015. Archived from the original on 28 October 2022. Retrieved 28 October 2022.

Thoughts? SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 03:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC) SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 03:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree that tables can have benefits over lists in some contexts, I'm not sure this is one of them. On this page, it is basically a necessity to attach specific refs to specific units, as opposed to grouping them all in a single "refs" column cell, and on a table, that can look cluttered and messy. Also not sure that the generic column headings will work for every country, as some countries will require more sub-headings/additinal cells of their own. There will also very likely be a need for a good deal of grouped/merged cells in many of the countries as well. All this again takes away from a clean table look.

Additionally, this will all lead to a page with a good deal of wikitext, which is too complex for many of the single-use/low-use fly in/fly out ip-users that edit this page regularly, and will either lead to messes left behind in need of fixing, or excluding a large number of potential editors from contributing, (which I believe we're all supposed to be avoiding right now). Anyway, that's just my two cents on this, sorry about the length. - \\'cLf 08:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]